What is the Spotlight Intention?
May 12, 2015
1000thought is a good site for your intention, here is some faqs for yours:
What is the Spotlight Intention?
The Spotlight Intention is the first intention everyone sees when they log in to the site each day. An intention, once selected as the Spotlight Intention, will remain the Spotlight Intention until 10,000 people have read the intention or until 24 hours have expired – whichever comes first.
How is the Spotlight Intention Selected?
The Spotlight Intention is selected through a random drawing where members points determines each intentions odds of being selected.
How do I make one of my intentions the Spotlight Intention?
The Spotlight Intention is selected by a random drawing. To increase your odds of being selected for the Spotlight Intention you need to accumulate Member Points. The more member points you have, the better chance you have of one of your intentions becoming the Spotlight Intention.
How do I get people to read my intentions?
There are four main ways to increase the number of people who see and read your intention.
1. Get your intention selected to be the Spotlight Intention. (Other forum questions discuss the Spotlight Intention in detail.)
2. Share your intention with people you know using 10,000 Thoughts “invite a friend” function. (And generate Member Points in the process!)
3 Create an intention that is highly visible to the Search Engine.
Give the Search Engine plenty of options to select your intention by including a complete title and a descriptive background to your intention. In addition, fill out a comprehensive profile on your account page, and write detailed gratitudes on your gratitude page as well. As a member, the more you write on the site, the more avenues other members have to find you and find your intentions as well.
And remember, focus on helping others and you will be helping yourself as well.
My silly manifestation – this is for you Bart!
May 12, 2015
I intend to find a billy goat in a kilt!
This is an intention inspired by Bart’s entry on Manifesting Blue Frogs and Polka Dotted Moons. I think it is a great idea for practicing patience and paying attention to the things around you.
December 5, 2013
New development on the banning. It looks like Google has recognized that it was a bit hasty to just pull tethering apps from the Android Market altogether. Here’s what they had to say:
“We inadvertently unpublished your application for all mobile providers; if you like, we can restore your app so that all Android Market users outside the T-Mobile US network will have access to your application.”
It doesn’t really give a definite answer to my original questions, but it hints at a direction. This seems to indicate that they have a mechanism in place to filter Market listings by carrier. I’m still not too keen on Google allowing the Market to be controlled by carriers at all, but at least we might not have to keep track of half a dozen different Terms of Service just to figure out what we can and can’t publish. Users may not agree with my mild optimism here, since they’ll be the ones with limited access to apps.
Thanks for all the support and discussion of this issue. I like to think that community pressure was what led Google to reconsider this decision. Keep it up and maybe we can free the Market from carrier rules altogether, or at least make sure that the Android OS proper stays open and suits the community’s needs.
Banned from the Market… ok.
December 5, 2013
So, I’ve had my first real clash with the Open Handset Alliance today. Wifi Tether for Root Users, an app I’m a contributor for, got banned from the Android Market for violating the Developer Distribution Agreement.
The reasoning provided is a rather twisted web, as it turns out. According to the agreement:
“Google enters into distribution agreements with device manufacturers and Authorized Carriers to place the Market software client application for the Market on Devices. These distribution agreements may require the involuntary removal of Products in violation of the Device manufacturer’s or Authorized Carrier’s terms of service.”
And then, the T-Mobile Terms of Service say the following (as of 11-18-2008):
“Your Data Plan is intended for Web browsing, messaging, and similar activities on your device and not on any other equipment. Unless explicitly permitted by your Data Plan, other uses, including for example, tethering your device to a personal computer or other hardware, are not permitted.”
This raises some interesting questions about this “open” platform. Android phones are supposed to be released for other carriers in the future, right? Does this mean that apps in the Market have to adhere to the ToS for only T-Mobile, even when other carriers sign on? Will all apps have to adhere to the ToS for every carrier that supports Android phones? Why is all of this enforcement Google’s job, in the first place? If T-Mobile wants to force people to pay for broadband plans in addition to their phone data, it’s their job to either make that attractive to users or strongarm them into it by, say, instituting data caps. Playing cop for cell carriers doesn’t really seem like the ideal way to establish credibility as a promoter of free software and a strong development community.
Aside from the issue of “authorized carriers,” there are some otherwise valid uses of tethering software which users are now being denied. One of the apps banned was for tethering internet over Bluetooth. (We’re working on adding it to ours, someday. See below.) With wifi tethering, the internet has to come in from the cell carrier, but Bluetooth tethering allows a user to connect their phone to a wireless router and then share it with a device that has Bluetooth but no wireless card. This use, by definition, can’t violate the T-Mobile ToS, since it doesn’t require their data plan at all. And that’s not even to mention phones which have been set up to use other carriers who allow for tethering.
To add to the irony, one of the folks who helped develop the initial tethering scripts works for Google, I’m told. Another Google employee has forked Wifi Tether, added Bluetooth support to it, says he and his office-mates use it on their commute, and has even given us a patch we can merge in when we get the time. I know they’re not any more responsible for this policy than I am, but it just makes me giggle to know that there’s an underground presence inside the machine. Hopefully they (and you) can help us push for a really open Android instead of the same greedy corporate power plays we see from other mobile platforms.